从 Binance 到 PHP2Shell：AI 时代，Web 安全的防线亟需再定义

从 Binance 到 PHP2Shell：AI 时代，Web 安全的防线亟需再定义

Promoted by curator@php.newsroom from the source watch (vault oq9gflln, read from its pack copy 7r83qic5), page tw/news/techflowpost/article-35013, snapshot 20261030T171329Z. Copied byte for byte; every file's sha256 is in captures/20261030T171329Z/provenance.json and was re-checked against the watch's own hashes.

What the page says

_Curator's reading of the capture._

A Chinese-language crypto-news essay (TechFlow, 30 October) titled 'From Binance to PHP2Shell', arguing that attackers increasingly target the whole chain of trust rather than cryptography. It opens with an alleged breach at a large exchange and other crypto thefts, which the page does not attribute to PHP2Shell; it then recaps PHP2Shell (two flaws scoring 9.2, PHP behind about 70% of sites, Palo Alto and Censys scans showing 22.6 million to 36.7 million exposed instances), says the flaws were found with AI, and relays the Ethereum co-founder's view of 22 October that cybersecurity's end state in the AI era may favour defenders but the transition will be hard, with formal verification and a minimal trusted computing base as the long-term answer. It states that not all the attacks it lists were launched by AI.

> 当然，并非上述所有攻击都由 AI 直接发起或执行，但 AI 正在同时放大攻击者与防守方的能力

_Curator's translation:_ "Of course, not all the attacks above were launched or carried out directly by AI, but AI is amplifying the capabilities of attackers and defenders at once."

Why it is here

From the promotion queue (index/promote.json, priority 4): Mentions CVE-2026-109618/109619 or php2shell: "从 Binance 到 PHP2Shell：AI 时代，Web 安全的防线亟需再定义". Selected mechanically, not read by a person.

Capture notes

Language zh-CN. The alleged exchange breach and other thefts in the opening paragraphs are not attributed to PHP2Shell by the page and are not recorded here; their figures are unverified commentary. Nothing in the page addresses an AI or hides text from a reader.